I can't speak to the UI and design.Free download ACDSee Photo Studio Ultimate 2023 v16. No, I haven't, I've read about it, and it seems it's a fairly simple viewer and if you already have one of the other ACDSee Photo Studio products, you simply don't need it. Off topic but have you tired ACDSee's new free photo viewer? I gave it a try but found it useless because of no histogram and a cluttered appearance.

In my mind, this is a good example of this. For years, they called their standalone editor, just 'Editor'. It's a professional DAM with a very simple touch up editor.ĪCDSee Systems (the company) has long had a 'tradition' of giving the worst possible names to their products. Those who need only the DAM would be advised to buy the 'ACDSee Studio Home product'. In truth I have not found any reason to switch to them, the level of fine control in color and lighting I find in the ACDSee Ultimate product, coupled with what I think is the best damn DAM out there, keeps me in the ACDSee camp. They are good products, though both lack a serious DAM. By modern standards, this is a fairly modest set-up, and I am VERY satisfied with the performance.Īs a bit of a software Geek, I have tried both C1 and DXO several times. I have an Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700 CPU 3.40GHz 3.41 GHz, 12 GB Ram (Lenovo Desktop), and an Nvidia GeForce 730 with 2GB onboard ram. It works with a shared resources Graphics card, but it's recommended to have a separate graphics card with at least 2Gb of onboard ram.

I have not encountered the problems you claim.

I think the key here is the company claim these figures and its rubbish im a long term user.Try C1 or DXO and see what real speed is all about

Download acdsee ultimate